急求跪求哪个高手能把下面的翻译一下啊 不要用翻译工具谢谢哈3.4.1 Elastic deflections According to Timoshenko bam theory,the deflection of a beam is caused by bending and shear when subjected to transverse loading and can be _作业帮
拍照搜题，秒出答案
急求跪求哪个高手能把下面的翻译一下啊 不要用翻译工具谢谢哈3.4.1 Elastic deflections According to Timoshenko bam theory,the deflection of a beam is caused by bending and shear when subjected to transverse loading and can be
急求跪求哪个高手能把下面的翻译一下啊 不要用翻译工具谢谢哈3.4.1 Elastic deflections According to Timoshenko bam theory,the deflection of a beam is caused by bending and shear when subjected to transverse loading and can be obtained by solving the equilibrium equations.Deflections at discrete locations can be computed by employing energy methods that incorporate the beam bending and shear stiffnesses. For some conventional materials, the shear deformation can be neglected because of the higher shear modulus. But for FRP materials the shear modulus of usually E/10, compared to E/2.5 for metallic beams, therfore, the thear deformation must be considered. Formulas for maximum bending and shear deflections for typical beam loading and boundary conditions are given in Table 6,as ---- (38) where in Table 6,Pis the concentrated load,q is the uniformly dis trebuted load, M is the transberse bending moment, L isthe span length, K is the shear correction factor(K=1.0 can be assumed),and D an F are the beam bending and shear stiffnesses(see Equation(35)).
3.4.1有弹性偏折 根据Timoshenko bam理论的,射线的偏折是由弯曲和剪造成的,当服从对横向装货,并且可以通过解决平衡等式获得.在分离地点的偏折可以通过使用合并弯曲的射线的能量方法计算并且剪僵硬.由于更高的剪模数,为一些常规材料,剪变形可以被忽略.但是为FRP材料通常E/10的剪模数,与金属射线的E/2.5比较,相对地更低; 必须考虑therfore,thear变形.最大值弯曲和剪偏折典型的射线装货的和边界条件的惯例在表6被给,---- (38) where在表6,Pis被集中的装载,q一致地是dis trebuted装载,M是transberse弯曲力矩,L是杆间距离,K是剪修正系数(K=1.0可以假设),并且D F是弯曲的射线并且剪僵硬(参见式(35)).请大家帮忙翻译下面的语句.很着急.谢谢各位高手啊你是一个整天忙着工作而无暇顾及生活的人吗?你是否整天忙着工作而忘记了发展兴趣,忘记了享受生活.那么你应该记住这么一句话：只工_作业帮
拍照搜题，秒出答案
请大家帮忙翻译下面的语句.很着急.谢谢各位高手啊你是一个整天忙着工作而无暇顾及生活的人吗?你是否整天忙着工作而忘记了发展兴趣,忘记了享受生活.那么你应该记住这么一句话：只工
请大家帮忙翻译下面的语句.很着急.谢谢各位高手啊你是一个整天忙着工作而无暇顾及生活的人吗?你是否整天忙着工作而忘记了发展兴趣,忘记了享受生活.那么你应该记住这么一句话：只工作不玩耍,聪明孩子也变傻.这句话的意思是说,如果一个人整天都努力地忙着工作,而不去娱乐,例如：唱歌、跳舞、聊天.那么长期这么下去,就容易思维缓慢,和不灵活.所以你应该学会留出时间让自己放松,在繁忙的工作之余活跃思维,开阔视野.但是另一方面,必须要强调的是,过多的娱乐也是不行的,它会使你的生活变得松散,没有目标,没有成就.所以重要的是合理安排时间,平衡好工作和娱乐之间的关系.所以试着在努力工作的同时娱乐和享受生活,你会发现你变得聪明又快乐.
你是一个整天忙着工作而无暇顾及生活的人吗?你是否整天忙着工作而忘记了发展兴趣,忘记了享受生活.那么你应该记住这么一句话：只工作不玩耍,聪明孩子也变傻.You are a busy all day work to care and life of the people?Whether you're busy with the work and forget the development interest,forgot to enjoy life.Then you should remember that such a few words:all work and no play makes jack a dull boy.这句话的意思是说,如果一个人整天都努力地忙着工作,而不去娱乐,例如：唱歌、跳舞、聊天.那么长期这么下去,就容易思维缓慢,和不灵活.所以你应该学会留出时间让自己放松,在繁忙的工作之余活跃思维,开阔视野.This means that,if a man all the efforts to busy with work,and not to entertainment,such as singing,dancing,chat.Then long-term so on easy to slow thinking,and not agile.So you should learn to set aside time for relaxation,in the busy work more active thinking,the open field of vision.但是另一方面,必须要强调的是,过多的娱乐也是不行的,它会使你的生活变得松散,没有目标,没有成就.所以重要的是合理安排时间,平衡好工作和娱乐之间的关系.But on the other hand,must want to emphasize,too much entertainment is no good,it will make your life become loose,no goal and no achievement.So the important thing is to arrange time properly balance the relationship between work and play.所以试着在努力工作的同时娱乐和享受生活,你会发现你变得聪明又快乐.So try hard at work at the same time entertainment and enjoy life,you will find that you become smart and happy.
Are you man who are busy with working and have littly time for enjoying life? Do you busy all day and forget the development of interest
and forget to enjoy life? Then you should remember this senten...求高手帮忙翻译，急啊，谢谢啦Hello James / KI have reviewed the answer and it does not match the issue 100% In root cause analysis your answer was:1.
The heads in the carton were the same with the large size label outside the carto_作业帮
拍照搜题，秒出答案
求高手帮忙翻译，急啊，谢谢啦Hello James / KI have reviewed the answer and it does not match the issue 100% In root cause analysis your answer was:1.
The heads in the carton were the same with the large size label outside the carto
求高手帮忙翻译，急啊，谢谢啦Hello James / KI have reviewed the answer and it does not match the issue 100% In root cause analysis your answer was:1.
The heads in the carton were the same with the large size label outside the carton which were HD WD RH XHOT FW 7FW WMS, but when shipment due to the new operator was unfamiliar with the large size label and small label lead to labeled wrongComment: Material requested on the PO was 1,000pzs of PN 2684076 HD WD RH XHOT FW 7FW WMS, 875pzs were ok physically a 125 pzs NOT OK physically were PN 2684056 HD WD RH XHOT FW 5FW WMS as declared in small label (the same as physical heads), large label declares 7FW (Large size label and head in carton were not the same, small label does match physically with the material inside)
The operators didn’t scan the labels with scan gun according to process after they labeled, so they failed to find out this problem in time.Comment: Could you explain a little bit more how the scanning after placing the label would avoid the issue from happening?
Do you scan both labels (small and large) to make sure both match between each other and vs the packing list? Maybe there is some misunderstanding of the issue and you are looking to attack the root cause from a different side that is not the one that provoked this failure, Could you please re-evaluate the CAR Answer and provide the correct one ASAP if applicable to change it? Please understand that in order to evaluate the answer I need to better understand the process and if you help me adding documentation related such as root cause analysis development (not only the final decision) , visual aids, work instructions, quality alerts, etc… it will be easier to evaluate the CAR. Also on corrective actions, please from every action declared as a change in the process, help me to include the proof of change (changes in: visual aids, work instructions, quality alerts, new lay outs, etc…) and if the action defined is in regard training I would like you to include the training records as well.
您好詹姆斯/肯;我已审阅的答案，它不匹配的问题100％ 在根本原因分析你的回答是：1。在纸箱的头与大尺寸的标签外纸箱HD WD RH XHOT FW 7FW WMS是相同的，但由于新的运营商时，运费不熟悉的大尺寸标签，小标签铅标记错误评论：要求的PO材料的PN 2684076 HD WD RH XHOT FW 7FW WMS是1000 PZS，87...
你好詹姆斯/肯;我有了答案,它不匹配问题的100%在根本原因分析你的回答是:1。头在纸箱是相同的与大尺寸的外箱标签高清WD RH XHOT FW 7 FW WMS,但当装运由于新运营商是不熟悉的大尺寸标签和小标签导致标记错误备注:材料要求在PO 1000 pzs PN 2684076 HD WD的RH XHOT FW 7,875 pzs FW WMS是好的身...
你好，詹姆斯/肯,我回顾了答案和它不匹配问题根源分析100%你的答案是:1。头一端在纸箱是相同的与大尺寸的外箱标签高清WD RH XHOT FW 7 FW WMS,但是当货物由于新运营商是不熟悉的大尺寸标签和小标签导致标记wrongComment:材料要求在PO（这个是术语缩写吧）是1000 pzs PN 2684076 HD WD的RH XHOT FW 7,875 pzs FW WMS是身体上和...英语翻译，求高手翻译啊，谢谢~~
英语翻译，求高手翻译啊，谢谢~~
求高手帮忙，感激不尽！！
补充：SEVERAL POSSIBLE OUTCOMES. Many have long called for a G20 summit toreplace the G8 one, and now that the former has finally arrived they will expect thisto be done soon. A second school sees the G8, a proven performer since it was firstformed in 1975, continuing indefinitely, even as the new G20 summit is subsumed orotherwise disappears once the financial crisis that created it is contained. A thirdschool sees cooperative coexistence, with each concentrating on what it does best orboth combining to actively work for the greater good. A fourth forecasts competition,with each seeking to globally govern the same things to different ends, with one institutionor its defining ideals winning out in the end.Even at this early stage, before there has been a single G8 summit held since the G20one sprung to life, three conclusions are clear. First, the G20 summit will coexist withthe G8 one, for both have much to offer and thus are here to stay. Second, the G20 willcooperate with the G8, for each is a club with its own dynamic, distinctive agenda.Third, the G20 and G8 summits will compete to generate effective global governanceon the basis of the very different purposes at their respective cores. Here, it must besaid, the G8’s foundational mission of globally promoting open democracy, individualliberty and social advance has already been steadily infiltrating the work of a G20 devotedto financial stability therefore, the G8 ideals are likely towin out in the end.COEXISTENCE. Both the G8 and G20 summits are likely to coexist for as far aheadas one can see. The G8 has the momentum of 35 years of proven performance, whichhas been rising in recent years. It has a well-established hosting sequence, with Italyin 2009 being followed by Canada in 2010. Dates, locations and agendas are put inplace a full year ahead of meetings. The subsequent hosting cycle will start in 2011,in France, and continue in 2012 in the US. It is highly unlikely that France’s NicolasSarkozy, not yet chosen to host a G20 at any level, would give up his place to shine inthe global governance sun. Nor would President Obama, whose country had a hand ininventing G8 summitry, practiced it successfully under presidents of both politicalstripes, and now needs great power cooperation more than ever. As with Bush, whenhe hosted the G8 in 2004, Obama will be facing re-election a few months after hostingthe 2012 G8. He is highly unlikely to show that he is less interested in, and worseat, high-level international cooperation than his predecessor. Nor is it likely thatAmerica’s and the world’s many acute problems will have receded by then.More broadly, each of the G8 leaders knows they will have a chance to host a summitwithin their political lifetime. There is no such assurance that they will ever host aG20 summit, both because there are many more countries in the club and because
America and Great Britain have monopolized the first three. Getting so many leaders,their delegations, their security and their media together in one place at one timepresents a scheduling and logistical challenge that privileges the larger countries atthe center of the North Atlantic core. Japan, for example, out in Asia, will cling to theG8, especially as its offers to host the second and then the third G20 summits have bothbeen politely refused. Such considerations would not matter if leaders concluded thatG8 or G20 summits are not worth their increasing time, trouble and expense. But nonehave done so, for all know that hosting and attending helps them manage their domesticpolitics back home. The smaller the club, the larger a leader looms in the photoops, after all.Moreover, leaders value the small cohesive G8 club for the enhanced opportunities itgives them to speak freely and frankly, to listen and learn seriously, to come to consensuson core principles, to take timely, well-tailored, ambitious collective decisions,and to call their colleagues to account face-to-face if they fail to deliver onpromises made. The larger the group, the fewer the chances for spontaneity, for theleaders of lesser powers to be heard, and for the club to move away from being merelyanother forum for delivering prepared speeches (like the General Assembly of theUN). While such features may matter less to the G8’s big four powers from Europe, theyare of central importance to a Canada, next door to a much larger US, and to a Japan,with a rising China at its side. That is why some G7 finance ministers still speak farmore fondly of their own October 2008 action in combating the current financial crisisthan they do of their simultaneous G20 gathering.Finally, as an institution, the G8 has a much longer and in some respects larger recordthan the G20 in expanding to absorb rising and reforming powers as full members andparticipants. The G8 has done so in ways that include more global regions, poor countriesand international institutions, all designed to achieve the central task at hand inthe best way possible. Since its start as a summit of four leaders at the British Embassyin Helsinki in July 1975, the G8 has more than doubled its membership. Its firstmajor expansion, from the four participants at the “Berlin Dinner” (US, UK, France,Germany) to the six at the first regular summit (Rambouillet, November 1975) was alreadya major advance. Adding Japan and Italy brought the world’s second and fifthranking powers in, turned a Euro-Atlantic club into a Mediterranean, Asian-Pacific,and thus global one, and significantly expanded the G8’s geographic, linguistic and religiousdiversity. Adding Canada, with the second largest territory in the world, in1976 made the G8 more of a Pacific and Arctic as well as an Atlantic and Americasclub. Adding the expanding multicultural EU in 1977 and, in 1998, Russia, reinforcedthe power, geographic reach, and diversity of the club, especially by bringing lesseconomically developed countries in.The G8 thus stands in sharp contrast with a UN Security Council that has been frozenwith the same permanent five members for 64 years, and with an International MonetaryFund and World Bank whose executive boards are largely unchanged since 1944.
翻译什么呀,请把材料上传.
可以帮忙翻译一下吗
wait a minute
不好意思,太长了.我只翻译了一部分.
SEVERAL POSSIBLE OUTCOMES. Many have long called for a G20 summit toreplace the G8 one, and now that the former has finally arrived they will expect this to be done soon.
几个可能的结果。许多人长期呼吁用20国高峰会替代8国峰会，那么现在前者（20国）已经最终达到，他们期待这个（20国峰会）将很快会做到的。A second school sees the G8, a proven performer since it was firstformed in 1975, continuing indefinitely, even as the new G20 summit is subsumed or otherwise disappears once the financial crisis that created it is contained.
第二种看法是，（很多人认为）8国是一个已经经过时间检验的表演者，自从它在1975年首次成立以来，长时间以来发挥着作用，甚至新的20国峰会也被包含其中，或者一旦由于财政危机（由于财政危机原因建立的20国峰会）被控制住，它（G20峰会）就会以其他的方式消失
A thirdschool sees cooperative coexistence, with each concentrating on what it does best or both combining to actively work for the greater good.
第三种看法是双方合作共存，分别专注于双方各自擅长的领域，或者，联合在一起积极地将工作做的更好。
A fourth forecasts competition,with each seeking to globally govern the same things to different ends, with one institution or its defining ideals winning out in the end.
第四种预测是竞争，在一个机构下面，双方各自争取在世界上管理同样的事情达到不同的结果，或者提出想法最终分出胜负。
Even at this early stage, before there has been a single G8 summit held since the G20 one sprung to life, three conclusions are clear. First, the G20 summit will coexist with the G8 one, for both have much to offer and thus are here to stay.
即使在最早的阶段，在20国峰会发挥作用前，只有一个8国峰会举行期间，有三个结论是清楚的。第一，20国峰会将和8国峰会并存，双方都有许多要提出的，这点这是大家公认的。
Second, the G20 willcooperate with the G8, for each is a club with its own dynamic, distinctive agenda.
第二，20国峰会将和8国峰会合作，双方分别都是一个拥有积极的、有特色的议事日程的俱乐部Third, the G20 and G8 summits will compete to generate effective global governanceon the basis of the very different purposes at their respective cores.
第三，在基于不同目的，在分别各自的核心方面，20国和8国峰会将会相互竞争实施有效的全球管理。
Here, it must be said, the G8’s foundational mission of globally promoting open democracy, individual liberty and social advance has already been steadily infiltrating the work of a G20 devoted to financial stability therefore, the G8 ideals are likely to win out in the end.
在这里，不得不说，8国的基本任务（全球提成开放的民主、个人自由和社会进步）已经稳步的渗透到20国致力于财政稳定和经济平稳工作之中，因此，8国的理念可能最终胜出。COEXISTENCE. Both the G8 and G20 summits are likely to coexist for as far ahead as one can see.
共存。8国和20国峰会双方将如同能够预见的一样，将会尽可能同存。
提问者 的感言：总之还是谢谢你，看来还得我自己来了，
其他回答 (2)
是翻译什么呀
翻译如下：
许多人长期呼吁20国集团首脑会议 取代八国集团之一，现在，前者终于来了，他们会希望这 在不久即可完成。第二个学校看到了八国集团，已经证明能够因为它是第一个 成立于1975年，继续下去，即使在新的20国集团首脑会议已经归纳或 否则一旦消失金融危机创建它包含。第三 学校认为合作共存，每于他们做的最好的还是集中 两相结合，积极工作，为更大的利益。甲比赛第四预测， 各方都要求在全球范围内管理同样的东西，以不同的目的与一个机构， 或其确定的理想，赢得了最后。 即使在这个早期阶段，才出现了一个单一的八国集团首脑会议举行以来，20国集团 见长的生活中，三个结论是明确的。首先，20国集团首脑会议将共存 八国集团之一，都有很大的贡献，因此在这里逗留。二，20国集团将 同八国集团合作，为每一个有自己充满活力，独特的议程俱乐部。 第三，20国集团和八国集团首脑会议将角逐产生有效的全球治理 对不同用途的基础上在各自的核心。在这里，我们必须 说，八国集团对全球范围内促进民主开放的基础性任务，个别 自由和社会进步已逐步渗透到了一个专门讨论20国集团的工作 财政稳定和经济平等，因此，八国集团理想可能 胜出而告终。 共存。无论是八国集团和20国集团首脑会议有可能共存为遥遥领先 大家也可以看到。八国集团有35验证的性能，几年势头 一直在上升，近年来。它有一个完善的主机序列与意大利， 在2009年被之后在2010年加拿大。日期，地点和议程的投入 一个全面提前一年举行会议。随后的存取周期将从2011年开始， 在法国，在2012年继续在美国。这是极不可能的，法国的尼古拉斯 萨尔科齐，尚未选定举办任何级别的20国集团将放弃自己的位置照向 全球治理的太阳。奥巴马总统也不会，他的国家插手 发明八国集团高层会晤，它成功地实行根据总统的政治 条纹，现在比以往任何时候更需要大国的合作。由于美国总统布什时， 他在2004年主办八国集团，奥巴马将面临重新选举后，举办了数个月 2012年八国集团。他是极不可能以显示他不太关心，更糟糕的 在高层次上成为比他的前任国际合作。也不是可能的 美国和世界的许多严重问题将回落到那时。 更广泛地说，八国领导人的每个人都知道，他们将有机会举办一次首脑会议 在其政治生命。没有这样的保证，他们都不会主持 20国集团首脑会议，一方面是因为还有很多的国家，因为俱乐部 美国和英国垄断前三。获得这么多的领导人， 他们的代表团，他们的安全和媒体一起在一个地方一次 提出了一个调度和后勤方面的挑战，特权，在较大的国家 在北大西洋的核心中心。以日本为例，在亚洲，将坚持以 八国集团，尤其是因为其提供主办的第二代，第三次20国集团首脑会议都 被婉言拒绝。这样的考虑将不要紧领导人认为， 八国集团或20国集团首脑会议是不值得的时间越来越多，麻烦和费用。但没有 这样做，因为大家都知道，主办和参加帮助他们管理自己的家庭 政治回家。较小的俱乐部，大领导织机的照片 老年退休金计划，毕竟。 此外，领导者的价值为更多的机会小俱乐部和凝聚力八国集团 让他们畅所欲言，坦率地说，在认真听取和学习，从而达成一致意见 核心原则，采取及时，以及定制的，雄心勃勃的集体决定， 并要求追究他们的同事面对面地面对，如果他们不能兑现 作出的承诺。集团越大，越少即兴创作的机会，为 小国的领导人进行聆讯，并为俱乐部摆脱被仅仅距离 另一提供（如大会准备好的发言稿论坛 联合国）。虽然这种功能可能与少的八国集团四大欧洲列强，他们 是至关重要的加拿大，隔壁一个更大的美国，并到日本， 崛起在中国一边。这就是为什么有些七国集团财长还远远发言 更深情地回忆了自己2008年10月在打击当前的金融危机采取行动 比他们做的同时20国集团会议。 最后，作为一个机构，八国集团更长，在某些方面较大的纪录 除了扩大吸收上升G20和改革的权力，并正式成员 参与者。八国集团这样做的方式，包括更具有全球性的地区，贫穷国家 和国际机构，旨在实现所有手头的中心任务 以最好的方式。由于其作为四国领导人在首脑会议开始，英国大使馆 在赫尔辛基，在1975年7月，八国集团增加了一倍以上的成员。它的第一个 主要扩建四个参与者，在“柏林晚餐”（美国，英国，法国， 德国）为六个第一次定期首脑会议（朗布依埃，1975年11月）已经 一大进步。加上日本和意大利带来了世界第二和第五 排名权力，翻开了欧洲大西洋到地中海，亚洲及太平洋俱乐部， 因此全球性的，并显着扩大了八国集团的地理，语言和宗教 多样性。添加加拿大，与世界第二大领土， 1976年的八国集团作出更多的是太平洋和北极以及一个大西洋和美洲 俱乐部。添加于1977年欧盟扩大文化，并在1998年，俄罗斯，强化 电力，地理范围，以及俱乐部的多样性，特别是通过将减少 经济发达的国家英寸 因此，主张八国集团已冻结与安理会形成鲜明对比 同样的五个常任理事国成员为64年，并与国际货币 基金和世界银行的执行委员会是1944年以来基本上没有改变。 内容参见 #
相关知识等待您来回答
外语领域专家
& &SOGOU - 京ICP证050897号}